Language Explorer
Quantitative comparison of programming languages — measured from real code, not opinions.
Zig vs RustTwo modern takes on systems programming. Different tradeoffs.
Zig
Rust
Zig Rust
Zig bets on simplicity — comptime, no hidden allocators, 65 concepts. Rust bets on safety — ownership, lifetimes, borrow checker, 110 concepts. Same polygon axes, radically different shapes.
Safety how we score →
compile-timeruntimenone
Zig3.3 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Rust4.8 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Expressiveness
How concise is the code? Averaged across 7 benchmark problems.
| Language ↕ | Lines ↑ | Verbosity ↕ | Ceremony ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clojure | ★8▼ | ★182▼ | ★0▼ |
| Erlang | ★12▼ | ★257▼ | ★0▼ |
| Objective-C | ★14▼ | ★320▼ | ★0.2▼ |
| Ruby | ★14.3▼ | ★206▼ | ★0.2▼ |
| Python | ★14.6▼ | ★228▼ | ★0.1▼ |
| JavaScript | ★15.7▼ | ★293▼ | ★0.2▼ |
| TypeScript | ★15.9▼ | ★320▼ | ★0.2▼ |
| C# | ★16▼ | ★291▼ | ★0.4▼ |
| Elixir | ★17.4▼ | ★262▼ | ★0.1▼ |
| Kotlin | ★19.7▼ | ★301▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| Haskell | ★21.9▼ | ★661▼ | ★0.2▼ |
| Swift | ★22.3▼ | ★436▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| Rust | ★22.6▼ | ★370▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| Go | ★26.6▼ | ★445▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| Java | ★26.6▼ | ★478▼ | ★0.4▼ |
| Milo | ★26.9▼ | ★593▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| C++ | ★27.9▼ | ★528▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| C | ★39.7▼ | ★951▼ | ★0.3▼ |
| Zig | ★39.9▼ | ★1055▼ | ★0.2▼ |
Full metrics on the Compare page. Methodology →
TypeScript vs JavaScript — Types added — 100 vs 65 concepts, but stronger safety
TypeScript
JavaScript
TypeScript JavaScript
Safety how we score →
compile-timeruntimenone
TypeScript3.3 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
JavaScript2.3 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Python vs Haskell — Same total concepts (75), opposite shapes
Python
Haskell
Python Haskell
Safety how we score →
compile-timeruntimenone
Python3.8 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Haskell4.8 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Rust vs Go — Systems safety vs simplicity
Rust
Go
Rust Go
Safety how we score →
compile-timeruntimenone
Rust4.8 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Go3.5 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
C vs Zig — C successor — similar size (60 vs 65), more safety
C
Zig
C Zig
Safety how we score →
compile-timeruntimenone
C0 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion
Zig3.3 / 5
MemoryNullRaceOverflowCoercion